Document Type : Original Article

Author

az

Abstract

The main concern in this article is the study of the role of conceptual metaphors in the field of ethics. After defining and conceptual metaphor, with emphasis on the views of Lakoff, Johnson and Movement, generality, inherent conceptuality, and system structure as the three main components of this kind of metaphor introduced, and its structural, ontological and guiding types were discussed. It was also stated that morality is a metaphorical nature and can not be conceived without conceptual metaphors. The introduction of metaphor to morality is shaped in two main forms: metaphorical conceptualization of metaphorical concepts and conceptualization of a particular moral situation. On the basis of these two points, the probability of falling metaphorical ethics in the context of relativity and critique and analyzing it continued to work. The main findings and innovations of this paper are in the design of three criteria for measuring the efficiency of metaphors in the field of ethics. The type and extent of the effect of metaphor on ethical reality, the type and extent of the effect of metaphor on moral motivation and the type and extent of the effect of metaphor on the objectification or tangibility of moral concepts are criteria that can both prevent relativity in metaphoric ethics and facilitate their grading of value.

Keywords

قرآن کریم.
-         حاج فرج‌الله دباغ، محمدحسین (1393) مجاز در حقیقت؛ ورود استعاره‌ها در علم. تهران: هرمس.
-          عندلیبی، عادل (1385) عبد؛ استعاره کانونی در انسان‌شناسی قرآن. نامه حکمت. شماره 7. بهار و تابستان. 144-129.
-         شیخ‌رضایی، حسین (1388 الف) استعاره و علم تجربی. فصلنامه اندیشه دینی دانشگاه شیراز. پیاپی 30. 77-54.
-         شیخ‌رضایی، حسین (1388 ب) اخلاق، استعاره و بازی. روش‌شناسی علوم انسانی. شماره 61. 168-143.
-         لیکاف، جورج (1385) محافظه‌کار، لیبرال را سرزنش می‌کند. ترجمه محمد محقق نیشابوری. خردنامه همشهری. شماره 9. آذر.47-44.
-         طباطبایی، محمدحسین (بی‌تا) ترجمه تفسیر المیزان. ترجمه سید محمدباقر موسوی همدانی. قم: دفتر انتشارات اسلامی. جلد اول.
-          هابز، توماس (1385) لویاتان. ترجمه حسین بشیریه. تهران: نی.
-          Burke, Michael (2017) The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics. Routledge.
-          Lakoff, Georg & Johnson, Mark (1980A) Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language. The Journal of Philosophy, volume 77, Issue8 ,453-486.
-          Lakoff, Georg & Johnson, Mark (1980B) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago Press.
-          Safarnejad, Fatemeh & others (2014) A cognitive study of happiness metaphors in Persian and English. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 118 . 110 – 117
-          Fan, LiPing (2018) Literature Review on The Cognitive Approach to Metaphor. Procedia Computer Science 131 . 925–928
-          Coeckelbergh, Mark (2007) Imagination and principles: an essay on the role of imagination in moral reasoning. Palgrave Macmillan.
-          Johnson, Mark (1993) Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics. The University of Chicago Press.
-          Johnson, Mark (2008) The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Edited by Raymond W. Gibbs. Cambridge University Press.
-          Tolman, Charles W (2012) Positivism in Psychology: Historical and Contemporary Problems. Springer Science & Business Media
-          Kovecses, Zoltan (2010) Metaphor : a practical introduction. Oxford University Press.
-          Kopp, Richard Royal (1995) Metaphor Therapy. Brunner/ Mazel.
-          Solonchak T., Pesina, S (2015) Cognitive Properties of Images and Metaphors. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 192 ,650 – 655.
-          Moschini, Lisa B. (2019) Art, Play, and Narrative Therapy using metaphor to enrich your clinical practice. Routledge.
-          Musolff, Andreas(2010) Metaphor, nation and the holocaust : the concept of the body politic .Routledge.
-          Pojman, Louis P. Fieser, James(2009) Ethics: Discovering Right and Wrong. Sixth Edition, Wadsworth