<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Zanjan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophical Meditations</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2228-5253</Issn>
				<Volume>4</Volume>
				<Issue>13</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Criteria of Ethical Act and the Relationship between Religion and Ethics from Motahari&#039;s Point of View</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Criteria of Ethical Act and the Relationship between Religion and Ethics from Motahari&#039;s Point of View</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>73</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>100</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19570</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>29</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Motahari&#039;s various perspectives on ethics have been widely presented in his works. This article elaborates on his account of two significant ethical problems. The first problem is the criteria of ethical act. By assessing some ideas on this subject, i.e. emotive theory, conscious theory and the theory of will, he tries to introduce the theory of dignity as the basis of Islamic ethics. The second problem is the relationship between religion and ethics, and whether is it necessary for ethics to be based on a religion. In his answer to this question, Motahari argues that religion is the only grounds for ethics and that ethics without religion is like an expired banknote. On the other hand, he regards moral act of an atheist as a valuable act. By appealing to the broad meaning of religion and the distinction between individual ethics and social ethics, this article tries to eliminate the apparent contradiction from Motahari&#039;s statements.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Motahari&#039;s various perspectives on ethics have been widely presented in his works. This article elaborates on his account of two significant ethical problems. The first problem is the criteria of ethical act. By assessing some ideas on this subject, i.e. emotive theory, conscious theory and the theory of will, he tries to introduce the theory of dignity as the basis of Islamic ethics. The second problem is the relationship between religion and ethics, and whether is it necessary for ethics to be based on a religion. In his answer to this question, Motahari argues that religion is the only grounds for ethics and that ethics without religion is like an expired banknote. On the other hand, he regards moral act of an atheist as a valuable act. By appealing to the broad meaning of religion and the distinction between individual ethics and social ethics, this article tries to eliminate the apparent contradiction from Motahari&#039;s statements.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ethics</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Islamic Ethics</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ethical Dignity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Goodness and Badness of Acts</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Religion</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Alterism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Consciousness</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://phm.znu.ac.ir/article_19570_d8030afe156a4de429b42187a7bb28eb.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
