<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Zanjan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophical Meditations</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2228-5253</Issn>
				<Volume>12</Volume>
				<Issue>28</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Contemporary Natural Theology and God of the gaps</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Contemporary Natural Theology and God of the gaps</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>325</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>352</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">247342</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30470/phm.2021.537989.2065</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Roozbeh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Zare</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of The Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought (IICT)</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2021</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Natural theology has entered a new phase in the contemporary period and empirical evidence or explanatory gaps of the new natural sciences take a significant role in this project. On the other hand, Theism has been wounded by a strategy in which the epistemological unknowns were argued in favour of the existence of God (God of the Gaps). In this article, the problems faced by the strategy of the god of the gaps and their proposed solutions are reviewed, and accordingly, two points have been declared: 1) Separation of boundary or limit questions from scientific questions are recognized and accepted, then a criterion is provided for this distinction based on the definition of Muslim philosophers for philosophical statements. 2) The activity of supernatural agents, including God, is comprehensively portrayed from the perspective of Islamic wisdom, and based on it, both the contemporary natural theology and its rival project (naturalism) have been rejected.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Natural theology has entered a new phase in the contemporary period and empirical evidence or explanatory gaps of the new natural sciences take a significant role in this project. On the other hand, Theism has been wounded by a strategy in which the epistemological unknowns were argued in favour of the existence of God (God of the Gaps). In this article, the problems faced by the strategy of the god of the gaps and their proposed solutions are reviewed, and accordingly, two points have been declared: 1) Separation of boundary or limit questions from scientific questions are recognized and accepted, then a criterion is provided for this distinction based on the definition of Muslim philosophers for philosophical statements. 2) The activity of supernatural agents, including God, is comprehensively portrayed from the perspective of Islamic wisdom, and based on it, both the contemporary natural theology and its rival project (naturalism) have been rejected.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Divine Action</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Limit questions</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">naturalism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Islamic philosophy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Causation</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://phm.znu.ac.ir/article_247342_d8f936dc8def8df3b61f0d62436289fd.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
