<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Zanjan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophical Meditations</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2228-5253</Issn>
				<Volume>7</Volume>
				<Issue>19</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Good Samaritan and Permissibility of abortion</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Good Samaritan and Permissibility of abortion</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>59</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>88</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">30133</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Zeinab</FirstName>
					<LastName>Dehghani. Nistani</LastName>
<Affiliation>MSc Student, Islamic Philosophy, Ma’somiyeh Seminary, Qom, Iran. (Correesponding author),  zeynab.dehghani65@gmail.com.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Alireza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Alebouyeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>-</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-6443-4583</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Judith Jarvis Thomson&#039;s &quot;Defense of Abortion&quot; is one of the most influential papers about Permissibility of abortion, So that after its publication in 1971 it has reprinted and criticized frequently. She uses the analogy as a reason for her claim and by relying on examples such as violinist, Henry Fonda, thief, two brothers&#039; chocolates and good Samaritan tried to prove her claim. In this article, one of her allegory namely the story of good Samaritan will be criticized and reviewed and her distinction between minimally good Samaritans and maximally good Samaritan as well as her distinction between law and morality will be challenged. &lt;br /&gt; Keyword&lt;br /&gt; Abortion, Minimally good Samaritans, Maximally good Samaritan, Thomson, Violinist.&lt;br /&gt; Judith Jarvis Thomson&#039;s &quot;Defense of Abortion&quot; is one of the most influential papers about Permissibility of abortion, So that after its publication in 1971 it has reprinted and criticized frequently. She uses the analogy as a reason for her claim and by relying on examples such as violinist, Henry Fonda, thief, two brothers&#039; chocolates and good Samaritan tried to prove her claim. In this article, one of her allegory namely the story of good Samaritan will be criticized and reviewed and her distinction between minimally good Samaritans and maximally good Samaritan as well as her distinction between law and morality will be challenged. &lt;br /&gt; Keyword</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Judith Jarvis Thomson&#039;s &quot;Defense of Abortion&quot; is one of the most influential papers about Permissibility of abortion, So that after its publication in 1971 it has reprinted and criticized frequently. She uses the analogy as a reason for her claim and by relying on examples such as violinist, Henry Fonda, thief, two brothers&#039; chocolates and good Samaritan tried to prove her claim. In this article, one of her allegory namely the story of good Samaritan will be criticized and reviewed and her distinction between minimally good Samaritans and maximally good Samaritan as well as her distinction between law and morality will be challenged. &lt;br /&gt; Keyword&lt;br /&gt; Abortion, Minimally good Samaritans, Maximally good Samaritan, Thomson, Violinist.&lt;br /&gt; Judith Jarvis Thomson&#039;s &quot;Defense of Abortion&quot; is one of the most influential papers about Permissibility of abortion, So that after its publication in 1971 it has reprinted and criticized frequently. She uses the analogy as a reason for her claim and by relying on examples such as violinist, Henry Fonda, thief, two brothers&#039; chocolates and good Samaritan tried to prove her claim. In this article, one of her allegory namely the story of good Samaritan will be criticized and reviewed and her distinction between minimally good Samaritans and maximally good Samaritan as well as her distinction between law and morality will be challenged. &lt;br /&gt; Keyword</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">abortion</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Minimally good Samaritans</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Maximally good Samaritan</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Thomson</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Violinist</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://phm.znu.ac.ir/article_30133_8c15857537ac1c1216ffb4d2fb1d6805.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
