<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Zanjan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophical Meditations</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2228-5253</Issn>
				<Volume>15</Volume>
				<Issue>34</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>On Rutger Bregman’s Humankind: Optimism For Realists, Or, Neither Hobbes Nor Rousseau</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>On Rutger Bregman’s Humankind: Optimism For Realists, Or, Neither Hobbes Nor Rousseau</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>67</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>88</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">726584</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30470/phm.2025.726584</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Robert</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hanna</LastName>
<Affiliation>Independent Philosopher, Canada</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>16</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This essay is a critical study of Rutger Bregman’s 2020 book, Humankind: A Hopeful History, from a broadly Kantian point of view. I present and defend the main points and arguments of the book, and on that basis, articulate a doctrine in social and political philosophy, which I call realistic-optimist dignitarian humanism, aka RODH, that I think captures the essence of what Bregman is driving at. Among its various theoretical and practical virtues, RODH gets constructively and creatively between Hobbes’s excessive pessimism about human nature on the one hand, and Rousseau’s unrealistic optimism about human nature on the other.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This essay is a critical study of Rutger Bregman’s 2020 book, Humankind: A Hopeful History, from a broadly Kantian point of view. I present and defend the main points and arguments of the book, and on that basis, articulate a doctrine in social and political philosophy, which I call realistic-optimist dignitarian humanism, aka RODH, that I think captures the essence of what Bregman is driving at. Among its various theoretical and practical virtues, RODH gets constructively and creatively between Hobbes’s excessive pessimism about human nature on the one hand, and Rousseau’s unrealistic optimism about human nature on the other.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Rutger Bregman</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Hobbes</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Kant</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Rousseau</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">human nature</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">dignitarianism</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Humanism</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://phm.znu.ac.ir/article_726584_647bd614af9ec3c76abe1bb20dfa9cd6.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
