<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Zanjan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophical Meditations</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2228-5253</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Cogent Conditional in Modern Logic</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Cogent Conditional in Modern Logic</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>7</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>46</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19496</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>28</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Al-Farabi and Avicenna have enumerated so many kinds of conditionals and produced a massive literature in their successors’ works. Two important kinds are the “cogent” and the “contingent,” which, in turn, are divided into more particular varieties. In this paper, I consider the “cogent conditional” and some kinds thereof. Four significant discussions here are: 1. the cogent conditional’s relation to the contingent conditional and to the general condition, 2. analysis of the kinds of the cogent conditional,  3. logical analysis of cogent conditional and of its kinds in Modern Logic and representing the relation between cogency and necessity,  4. the truth conditions of cogent conditional. In the recent decades, the logical analysis of the cogent conditionals and their truth-conditions has been widely discussed. But the discussions have generally been fulfilled in different ways, which are sometimes inconsistent with each other. It has even been proposed to use three-valued tableaux to analyze the cogent conditionals. In this paper, I will quote the key phrases from Ancient Logic to criticize the contemporaries’ analyses and thereby to introduce mine.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Al-Farabi and Avicenna have enumerated so many kinds of conditionals and produced a massive literature in their successors’ works. Two important kinds are the “cogent” and the “contingent,” which, in turn, are divided into more particular varieties. In this paper, I consider the “cogent conditional” and some kinds thereof. Four significant discussions here are: 1. the cogent conditional’s relation to the contingent conditional and to the general condition, 2. analysis of the kinds of the cogent conditional,  3. logical analysis of cogent conditional and of its kinds in Modern Logic and representing the relation between cogency and necessity,  4. the truth conditions of cogent conditional. In the recent decades, the logical analysis of the cogent conditionals and their truth-conditions has been widely discussed. But the discussions have generally been fulfilled in different ways, which are sometimes inconsistent with each other. It has even been proposed to use three-valued tableaux to analyze the cogent conditionals. In this paper, I will quote the key phrases from Ancient Logic to criticize the contemporaries’ analyses and thereby to introduce mine.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">conditional</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Cogent Conditional</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Contingent Conditional</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">implication and necessity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">truth-conditions</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">three-valued logic</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://phm.znu.ac.ir/article_19496_4d20162dc918b678fae70a510deb56e4.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Zanjan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophical Meditations</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2228-5253</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Richard Rorty on Truth as aim of inquiry</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Richard Rorty on Truth as aim of inquiry</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>47</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>65</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19497</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>28</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This paper is concerned with analysis of neopragmatist attitude of Richard Rorty about objective truth. According to Rorty, the aim of inquiry is not discovering of &quot;objective truth &quot;as considered by previous thinkers. Rorty believed that conceptions like Truth, Reality and Realism are similar conceptions. Hence rejecting objective truth requires the rejection of realism. Objective truth in metaphysics has been described as ahuman and ahiostorical features. Therefore, Rorty believes that the aim of inquiry is empowerment of human situation and creation of solidarity and untimely intersubjectivity agreement. But this article wants to show that the solidarity and intersubjectivity agreement have some features which objective truth has them.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This paper is concerned with analysis of neopragmatist attitude of Richard Rorty about objective truth. According to Rorty, the aim of inquiry is not discovering of &quot;objective truth &quot;as considered by previous thinkers. Rorty believed that conceptions like Truth, Reality and Realism are similar conceptions. Hence rejecting objective truth requires the rejection of realism. Objective truth in metaphysics has been described as ahuman and ahiostorical features. Therefore, Rorty believes that the aim of inquiry is empowerment of human situation and creation of solidarity and untimely intersubjectivity agreement. But this article wants to show that the solidarity and intersubjectivity agreement have some features which objective truth has them.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Richard Rorty</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">objective truth</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">inquiry</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Realism</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://phm.znu.ac.ir/article_19497_a66ca8d00dcf305f7343b63fce3d3d30.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Zanjan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophical Meditations</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2228-5253</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The possibility of the role of religious 
education in global village</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The possibility of the role of religious 
education in global village</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>66</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>82</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19498</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>28</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Present century is distinguished from other centuries by its Information-Technology character .It is easy to see with wonder how Information-Technology has reduced the world to a global village through internet, satellite, and so on .Therefore, the question is that whether in such a world –global village-moral values are workable and possible? Religious education, in general, aims at producing desired changes in new generation. This goal was always fulfilled through building limited condition and making barriers. In present century it is impossible to keep new generation away from other cultures due to Information-Technology. It means in global village, making barriers does not work, and in such a world how one can educate religion? The aim of this paper is to display the role of religious education in global village by giving a spiritual notion of humanity.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Present century is distinguished from other centuries by its Information-Technology character .It is easy to see with wonder how Information-Technology has reduced the world to a global village through internet, satellite, and so on .Therefore, the question is that whether in such a world –global village-moral values are workable and possible? Religious education, in general, aims at producing desired changes in new generation. This goal was always fulfilled through building limited condition and making barriers. In present century it is impossible to keep new generation away from other cultures due to Information-Technology. It means in global village, making barriers does not work, and in such a world how one can educate religion? The aim of this paper is to display the role of religious education in global village by giving a spiritual notion of humanity.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Global Village</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">religious education</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Information technology</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://phm.znu.ac.ir/article_19498_2da1cfad54d3358c7f53fb23d7ce4c9d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Zanjan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophical Meditations</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2228-5253</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A Study of Mulla Sadra and Avicenna&#039;s Approach to God&#039;s Attributes</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>A Study of Mulla Sadra and Avicenna&#039;s Approach to God&#039;s Attributes</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>83</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>101</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19499</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>28</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>God&#039;s attributes is one of the crucial issues in theology. This is being discussed in two aspects: the relation of attributes to God&#039;s essence, and the relation of different attributes with each other. The question, on one hand, is whether or not God possesses any attribute, and on the other hand, it can be questioned what is the relation between attribute themselves.  The traditional answers in this regard are divided into two approaches, agnosticism and anthropomorphism. However, both approaches face some problems. In this paper, it will be attempted to show that how philosophers&#039; explanation of God&#039;s attributes puts them into trouble, and will be argued that both approaches to God&#039;s attributes are faced with some problems.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">God&#039;s attributes is one of the crucial issues in theology. This is being discussed in two aspects: the relation of attributes to God&#039;s essence, and the relation of different attributes with each other. The question, on one hand, is whether or not God possesses any attribute, and on the other hand, it can be questioned what is the relation between attribute themselves.  The traditional answers in this regard are divided into two approaches, agnosticism and anthropomorphism. However, both approaches face some problems. In this paper, it will be attempted to show that how philosophers&#039; explanation of God&#039;s attributes puts them into trouble, and will be argued that both approaches to God&#039;s attributes are faced with some problems.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Attributes</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">God</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">objective identification</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">conceptual identification</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://phm.znu.ac.ir/article_19499_4f1730a9b124eea813b992edebc06840.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Zanjan</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophical Meditations</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2228-5253</Issn>
				<Volume>1</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>An analytic study about development of the concept of Soul from Plato to Mulla Sadra</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>An analytic study about development of the concept of Soul from Plato to Mulla Sadra</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>102</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>125</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">19500</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>28</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Whereas Plato believes that the soul belongs to another world and defines it as an order different from the body, Aristotle whose opinion were more concentrated on the disquisition and state of real function of creatures of this world, had emphasizes on announcing his idea about the essence and nature of the creatures. Similarly, he had analyzed the living creatures in the soul definition and described it as the form of the body. Platonous believes, Soul is a part of an entire soul and factor of the triple Aghanim which its one side is faced to the territory of the Nous and the other side is tends to the material world and body, in the other world, it is the ring of the connection of the spiritual and material world. Ibn Sina&#039;s base of his religious beliefs for proving spiritual immortality of Soul in defines Soul as abstract and as the perfection of the body. The concepts proposed by Platonous and sages of ancient Persia about Soul, were the revelation for Suhrawardi, the Ishragh sect philosopher of the Islamic world to know it moral and the Anvare Modire phenomena and called as the light of Eshbbodies which is responsible for controlling the body. All mentioned philosophers faced to the some difficulties and paradoxes in the way of defining the relation of Soul with the body. Therefore, Mulla Sadra affected from previous thinkers and based on his vital innovations in existence precedes essence in a new way, which in addition of being true and strong, it is free of regarding problems.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Whereas Plato believes that the soul belongs to another world and defines it as an order different from the body, Aristotle whose opinion were more concentrated on the disquisition and state of real function of creatures of this world, had emphasizes on announcing his idea about the essence and nature of the creatures. Similarly, he had analyzed the living creatures in the soul definition and described it as the form of the body. Platonous believes, Soul is a part of an entire soul and factor of the triple Aghanim which its one side is faced to the territory of the Nous and the other side is tends to the material world and body, in the other world, it is the ring of the connection of the spiritual and material world. Ibn Sina&#039;s base of his religious beliefs for proving spiritual immortality of Soul in defines Soul as abstract and as the perfection of the body. The concepts proposed by Platonous and sages of ancient Persia about Soul, were the revelation for Suhrawardi, the Ishragh sect philosopher of the Islamic world to know it moral and the Anvare Modire phenomena and called as the light of Eshbbodies which is responsible for controlling the body. All mentioned philosophers faced to the some difficulties and paradoxes in the way of defining the relation of Soul with the body. Therefore, Mulla Sadra affected from previous thinkers and based on his vital innovations in existence precedes essence in a new way, which in addition of being true and strong, it is free of regarding problems.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">soul</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">body</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Perfection</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">abstraction</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">unity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Mulla sadra</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Plato</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://phm.znu.ac.ir/article_19500_e353194f3b7cd1b75d69c3ab88041985.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
