The following article discusses the problem of univocity in theology. It considers the classical dilemma that univocal terms used of God and human beings compromise God’s mystery while terms used equivocally of each compromise knowledge of God. One solution is that all terms used of both are analogous. Critical arguments against univocity, equivocity, and analogy are considered. Modern analysis of analogy identifies significant problems with the theory, prompting reconsideration of arguments against univocity since equivocity holds no promise for theological knowledge. Our thesis is that these arguments have plausible responses and propose a way of conceiving univocity in theology.
Hollon,Elton L . (1404). A Small Catechism for Univocity in Theology. تأملات فلسفی, 15(34(Special issue: Meditation)), 229-259. doi: 10.30470/phm.2025.726806
MLA
Hollon,Elton L . "A Small Catechism for Univocity in Theology", تأملات فلسفی, 15, 34(Special issue: Meditation), 1404, 229-259. doi: 10.30470/phm.2025.726806
HARVARD
Hollon Elton L. (1404). 'A Small Catechism for Univocity in Theology', تأملات فلسفی, 15(34(Special issue: Meditation)), pp. 229-259. doi: 10.30470/phm.2025.726806
CHICAGO
Elton L Hollon, "A Small Catechism for Univocity in Theology," تأملات فلسفی, 15 34(Special issue: Meditation) (1404): 229-259, doi: 10.30470/phm.2025.726806
VANCOUVER
Hollon Elton L. A Small Catechism for Univocity in Theology. تأملات فلسفی. 1404;15(34(Special issue: Meditation)):229-259. doi: 10.30470/phm.2025.726806