Relationship between epistomology, moral of scepticism and form of life according to Cavell's Wittgenstein

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Mozhgan Khalili 1
Ali Akbar Ahmadi Aframjani 2
1 Allame Tabatabaei University
2 Philosophy, Humanities, Allameh Tabatabai, Tehran, Iran
10.30470/phm.2019.113185.1671
Abstract
According to Cavell, on one hand relation between moral values and the reality based on the grammatical criteria of Wittgenstein is not rational; on the other hand, disability of moral criteria is not logical .From this point of view, the claim of having access to the pure reality is meaningless, because there is not a logical possibility of such success that one can or cannot do it. In other words, we don't have the natural possibility for having a logical and rational way to solve moral problems. Therefore moral issues are not rational.From the view of Cavell’s Wittgenstein, meaning is appearing during using language game inside its form of life. So, in the process of responding to an ethical request, Wittgenstein's human, responds to the reality in certain situations, depending on the conditions, with the intention and moral judgment, Thus from his view point, before using words in moral language games, we do not have meaning.

Keywords

-         آلن، ریچارد و دیگران. (1389). ویتگنشتاین، نظریه و هنر. به کوشش ریچارد آلن و ملکم تروی. ترجمه فرزان سجودی. تهران: فرهنگستان هنر.
-         اسکیلاس، اوله مارتین. (1387). درآمدی بر فلسفه و ادبیات. ترجمه مرتضی نادری دره شوری. تهران: نشر اختران.
-         ابوت، متیو. (1396). عباس کیارستمی، فیلم و فلسفه. ترجمه صالح نجفی. تهران: نشر لگا.
-         دنیوی، محسن. (1396). مفهوم واقعیت در نگرش ویتگنشتاین. تأملات فلسفی. دانشگاه زنجان: سال هفتم. ش: 19.
-         مثمر، رضا. ( 1398). خوبی، خوش‌کامی و پذیرش جهان از دیدگاه ویتگنشتاین متقدم. پژوهش‌های فلسفی. دانشگاه تبریز: سال 13، ش. 27.
-          Bates, Stanley. (1980). The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy Review.Philosophy and Literature.Vol.4. No.2. p: 266-273.
-          Cavell, Stanley. (1979).The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, andTragedy. Oxford University Press: CoW.
-          Cavell, S., (1969). Must We Mean What We Say. A Book of Essays. New York: WV.
-          Cavell, Stanley. (2006). Philosophy the Day after Tomorrow. Harvard University Press: PoH.
-          Glock, Hans-John. (1996). A Wittgenstein Dictionary: Black Well.
-          McDowell, J. .(1996). Mind and World. Harvard University Press.
-          Mannison, D. & Reinhardt, L. (1982). The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy; Critical notice. Philosophical Investigations. Vol. 5. No.3. pp: 227–244: M&R.
-          Rothman, William. ( 2000). Reading Cavell's The world viewed. Publisher: Wayne State University Press.
-          Sharrock, Danièle, Moyal. (2015). Wittgenstein on Forms of Life, Patterns of Life, and ways of Living. Nordic Wittgenstein Review Special Issue.
-          Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (2009).Philosophical Investigations. (en face German-English edition). Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker and Joachim Schulte: WILEY-Blackwell: PI.
-          Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On Certainty. G. E. M. Anscombe & von Wright. (ed.). translated by: Denis Paul & G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell: OC.