Review of three arguments Sollami, Torsi and Hefz Al nesbe( maintaining the relation) in proving finiteness of dimensions based on Mullah Abdul Razzaq Lahiji's view

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
seyed Reza Moazzen 1
mohamad mahdi Meshkati 2
1 PHD ,Department of Islamic Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, university of Esfahan, Esfahan, Iran
2 University Of Esfahan
10.30470/phm.2020.38501
Abstract
Finiteness of dimensions is the confirmation default of many philosophical approaches. This article based on Abdul Razzaq Lahiji's views addresses this issue. First, it analyzes the exact structure of the problem and shows the exact formulation of the problem to remove structural ambiguity and linguistic and subjective ambiguity, after that identifies this problem. This article suggests that it is better to examine this issue in teachings, although in realization, the philosophers have categorized this issue in natural sciences and theology. As a judge between classifying this issue in natural sciences and theology, Mir Damad's view that is classification in theology is underlined by the article. This article, in reasoning for the scientific recognition of finiteness of dimensions analyzes three arguments of its six_ dimensional arguments that are close to exit based on Lahiji's view. Among these three arguments Lahiji considers only the argument of maintaining the relation empty of any impediment and considers the other two arguments specifically from the claim. This article monitors the scientific evolution in these three arguments and reports it as an innovation in its reasoning.

Keywords